This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] Re: Re: FYI: IANA delegation procedure for the root zone and ipv6 glue

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: FYI: IANA delegation procedure for the root zone and ipv6 glue
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] FYI: IANA delegation procedure for the root zone and ipv6 glue

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Wed Jul 14 23:14:06 CEST 2004

On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 07:11:51PM +0200,
 Peter Koch <pk at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> wrote 
 a message of 17 lines which said:

> Now, what about
> _ldap._tcp.Standardname-des-ersten-Standorts._sites.dc._msdcs.office.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE?
> 
> The name is "long" but not "only-intended-to-break-the-512-bytes-limit".

You're right, SRV records, IDN, DNSSEC, domain names in german, and of
course IPv6 have all the potential to "innocently" break the 512-bytes
limit. That's why all DNS software should support EDNS0, IMHO.

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: FYI: IANA delegation procedure for the root zone and ipv6 glue
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] FYI: IANA delegation procedure for the root zone and ipv6 glue

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]