This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] dnsmon / .org

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hans Petter Holen hpholen at tiscali.no
Fri Sep 12 18:00:56 CEST 2003

> On 10.09 12:18, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> > RIPE NCC should only monitor those ccTLDs that are LIRs or that their LIR
> > is willing to endorse.   -Hank
>
> I like the principle. However ....
>
> How would this endoresement be determined?

You offer the service only to members, so if a names server operator wants
this service they sign up as a member.

You probably should add a new billig category for this.

But that should be simple following the last AGM.

> Doing it simple-mindedly potentially leads to a *very* long list of
> domains to monitor, and not only (cc)TLDs.

Doing it this way the list will never be longer than your membership list.

-hph

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] dnsmon / .org

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]