This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RE: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Wed Sep 10 16:48:51 CEST 2003
At 11:36 AM 10-09-03 +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: >On 10.09 12:18, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > > RIPE NCC should only monitor those ccTLDs that are LIRs or that their LIR > > is willing to endorse. -Hank > >I like the principle. However .... > >How would this endoresement be determined? Each LIR would be entitled to one ccTLD to be monitored. Most won't need it. Assuming there are about 50 countries in the RIPE area, and about 3500 LIRs, I am sure that one can find a LIR to support a ccTLD to be monitored. That means that the other countries in ARIN/APNIC/LACLIC would have to fund their own service. -Hank LIR: il.iucc >Doing it simple-mindedly potentially leads to a *very* long list of >domains to monitor, and not only (cc)TLDs. > > >Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RE: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]