This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] "adding IPv6 glue to root zone" document
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] "adding IPv6 glue to root zone" document
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] rMX and rDNS together make spamming more difficult ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mohsen Souissi
Mohsen.Souissi at nic.fr
Mon Nov 17 09:15:31 CET 2003
On 16 Nov, Ronald van der Pol wrote: | On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 18:30:27 +0100, Mohsen Souissi wrote: | | > ==> Hmmm... Can you reach them? ;-) I can't ! Going back to a | > discussion which took place 2 years ago on dnsop mailing-list, I found | > the following thread: | > | > http://www.cafax.se/dnsop/maillist/2001-09/msg00021.html | | I guess we are not on the same frequency yet. All I am saying is | that those mapped addresses are in DNS now. So, they are inserted into | the additional section and may cause drops. I agree with you that it | is quite useless (and even harmful) to put them in DNS. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ==> That's why I was talking about relevance of these addresses in my first message :-) On my turn, I agree with you can put any IPv6 address in the DNS provided that it is correctly formatted. | Are we in sync again? ==> Yes we are! Mohsen.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] "adding IPv6 glue to root zone" document
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] rMX and rDNS together make spamming more difficult ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]