[dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness

At 4:59 PM +0200 2003/05/22, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote:

>>	At the very least, a more coordinated and public "name and shame"
>>  campaign might possibly do some good.
>
>  Be careful with "name and shame" policies. People might start asking
>  why an organisation they are giving money to (particularly if they
>  have only one choice for that organisation) would go about "naming
>  and shaming" them.

	Sorry, when I said "name and shame", I meant from the perspective 
of an independent third party.  Something along these lines is 
already done today, but I believe that these efforts could be 
increased and improved on.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)