This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Remote registration,
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Remote registration,
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Remote registration,
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Jul 28 11:05:19 CEST 2003
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 12:14:46AM +0200, Brad Knowles <brad.knowles at skynet.be> wrote a message of 68 lines which said: > > But complexity for software, tend to generate various issue... > > If you want a fully compliant nameserver, there's not much choice. Fully compliant with every RFC ever published about the DNS? Come on, most TLDs use only a very small fraction of it (is there a TLD which authorizes UPDATE?) and they typically shut down, at compile time or configuration time, most of the features of BIND. PS: BTW, I regret that a question about "remote registration" turns into a discussion on the best nameserver software. Most of the problems of a TLD do not come from the nameserver (some even outsources it like ".info") but from the registration system, which was the original question, and a much more difficult one.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Remote registration,
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Remote registration,
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]