This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Remote registration,
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Remote registration,
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Remote registration,
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Jul 28 11:00:45 CEST 2003
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 12:14:46AM +0200, Brad Knowles <brad.knowles at skynet.be> wrote a message of 68 lines which said: > IIRC, it doesn't support any of the DNSSEC stuff. Expected "soon". The current version, 1.2.1, already contains many internal things useful for DNSsec. > The support staff are excellent, and the company is willing to work > closely with folks to find a solution that works best for them. Even in Iran, which was the original question? One of the problems with proprietary code is that you depend on the relations between your governement and the US governement. For instance, users of MS-Windows server OS in India were denied updates of their software after the nuclear tests (desktop OS were not concerned but server OS were on a black list).
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Remote registration,
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Remote registration,
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]