This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] DNS registry sofwtare (Was: Ripe 46 Meeting
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS registry sofwtare (Was: Ripe 46 Meeting
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS registry sofwtare (Was: Ripe 46 Meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Thu Jul 17 14:10:11 CEST 2003
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:58:40PM +0200, Edward Lewis <edlewis at arin.net> wrote a message of 60 lines which said: > It is true that earlier versions of EPP are running around, "Running around" is a nice word for something in use in ".biz" and ".info". > if the software base isn't conformant to the Queued documents > (better yet the resulting RFCs), I'd be wary to count on it for my > operations. This is a very strange argument. Gandi's IRI works with the EPP actually used in the registries. This makes sense, from an user's point of view.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS registry sofwtare (Was: Ripe 46 Meeting
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS registry sofwtare (Was: Ripe 46 Meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]