This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/

[dns-wg] DNS registry sofwtare (Was: Ripe 46 Meeting

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS registry sofwtare (Was: Ripe 46 Meeting
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS registry sofwtare (Was: Ripe 46 Meeting

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Thu Jul 17 12:08:35 CEST 2003

On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 11:57:49AM +0200,
 Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap at sidn.nl> wrote 
 a message of 11 lines which said:

> EPP is not a moving target.  The specs are in the rfc-editor queue.
> When they are published as RFC (proposed Draft) then EPP will be
> offical.
> 
> People having done implementations on earlier drafts created what
> seems to be a moving target.

Most big EPP registries do *not* use the current version (the one in
the RFC Editor queue).

Most free EPP software do *not* use the current version (and hence do
not interoperate, for instance Gandi's IRI, which works with ".biz"
and ".info" registries does not work with OpenReg).

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS registry sofwtare (Was: Ripe 46 Meeting
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS registry sofwtare (Was: Ripe 46 Meeting

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]