This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
- Previous message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
- Next message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Jan 20 12:14:23 CET 2003
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:01:56PM +0100, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote a message of 22 lines which said: > > Yes, they had, but ICANN/DoC bureaucrats hold them hostages. > > If people feel inclined to send e-mail about this subject, please > address it to one or more of the persons mentioned on Funny joke, writing to ICANN when you disagree with them :-) > http://www.icann.org/general/abouticann.htm I am aware that RIPE is not ICANN and that ICANN Web server is www.icann.org. I just wanted to be sure that nobody left the thread with the impression that some ccTLD managers are lousy enough to take several months to make their paperwork when a nameserver changes. Now that the responsabilities have been clearly determined, we can go back to nsd.
- Previous message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
- Next message (by thread): Experiments on production DNS (was: Re: NS.EU.NET running NSD)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]