This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Previous message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Next message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jakob Schlyter
jakob at crt.se
Fri Feb 7 19:47:58 CET 2003
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 4:58 PM +0100 2003/02/07, Jakob Schlyter wrote: > > > nsd could be configured to either hand out a referral or send SERVFAIL. > > It should be configured to hand out a referral. if you do not include a hints file in nsd's database, it will return SERVFAIL. > > bind9 will reply with REFUSED if the hints file is missing and it is > > configured to be authoritative only. > > Are you sure? For which version of BIND 9? My understanding is > that they had a pre-compiled list of the root servers built into the > source code, and that this would be used to generate the initial > "hints" zone, thus allowing you to avoid having this file. Indeed, I > wouldn't be surprised at all if the built-in data over-rode the file, > but maybe that's going too far. if you set up bind9 with a authoritative-only view it will return REFUSED. in a "normal" configuration, it will use pre-compiled root-hints. jakob
- Previous message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Next message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]