This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Previous message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Next message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at cisco.com
Fri Feb 7 14:42:31 CET 2003
On torsdag, feb 6, 2003, at 18:42 Europe/Stockholm, Stefan Paletta wrote: > Some TLD registries, however, make unreasonable demands regarding the > behaviour of servers to which they delegate zones. Most notably the > .fr and .it registries, which apparently demand that servers return a > (non-authoritative!, in the case of .it) referral to the root servers > when they are lame. Do you have a pointer to this rule of theirs? In many cases an NS is lame simply because no DNS server is listening on the IP address which is associated with the NS in question. I.e. that someone has moved the server without talking to the parent zone administrator. paf
- Previous message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
- Next message (by thread): clueing in TLD registries for delegations to non-BIND servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]