New draft charter for the RIPE DNS WG

Brad Knowles wrote:

> 	Distribution of RIPE-area TLDs across a robust set of servers 
> that are geographically diverse, and making this a "Best Current 
> Practice" advocated by the WG, and then taking the next step and 
> making this an actual RIPE requirement (and something that RIPE NCC 

what do you mean by "RIPE requirement" in this context? I do not see
any means by which the NCC, the WG or RIPE could or should try to "enforce"
anything in that field.

Anyway, the NCC already contributes to this BCP by providing DNS secondary
service for TLDs (even more recently). The aspect of topological diversity
is approached by the ``shared secondary servers(?)'' project, which I think
is led by DE-NIC under the umbrella of CENTR. So, should we try to learn
more about these efforts?

-Peter