New draft charter for the RIPE DNS WG

As i said in the email i am not against the charter i just wanted to clarify
that we will not take resources from the NCC like the Test Traffic white
elephant did (though i am sure Daniel would disagree ;).


Stephen Burley
WorldCom EMEA Hostmaster
SB855-RIPE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niall Richard Murphy" <niallm-ripe at enigma.ie>
To: "Stephen Burley" <stephenb at uk.uu.net>
Cc: <dns-wg at ripe.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: New draft charter for the RIPE DNS WG


> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:32:55AM +0100, Stephen Burley wrote:
>
> Stephen,
>
> I'm not sure to what extent the hostmaster function of the NCC provides
> the cycles to make the WG go.
>
> My impression is that the majority of the work comes from the members, the
> chairs, and non-directly-registration-related NCC staff. Hence my
contention
> would be that an expanded charter will not change the wait-queue time.
>
> Niall
>
> > I would just like to remind all that the more RIPE/NCC get diversified
in
> > their focus, the less gets done in the areas that realy matter to us. I
am
> > not disagreeing with the outline i just feel we need to evaluate how
much of
> > what is discussed at the meetings is IP relavent. We can not complain at
the
> > NCC about high wait times on requests if we the community are
distracting
> > the NCC with none core function projects and fact finding.
>
> --
> Enigma Consulting Limited: Security, UNIX and telecommunications
consultants.
> Address: Floor 2, 45 Dawson Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
> http://www.enigma.ie/