This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
New draft charter for the RIPE DNS WG
- Previous message (by thread): New draft charter for the RIPE DNS WG
- Next message (by thread): New draft charter for the RIPE DNS WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Thu Jul 11 15:15:57 CEST 2002
Hello Jaap, > the core business of a registry (at least, that is my personal > opinion) is the maintenance of the zonefile, there is overlap with well, the registries do a lot of database, whois, "IP", lawyers and politics work and one side effect is they produce a zone file. > So, one way to answer your question would be to say that DNS-wg is > more concerned with the dns protocol sec then with other things > surrounding it. That's it. The emphasis on "quality" really meant DNS technical and operational quality, like lame delegations, server redundancy, TTL values, future KEY issues and so on. It's not about the accuracy of the whois data or the quality of the registration policy documents. These nevertheless important topics are covered e.g. in the DNR forum. So, do you think that particular sentence needs rewording? -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): New draft charter for the RIPE DNS WG
- Next message (by thread): New draft charter for the RIPE DNS WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]