This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Please publish.
- Previous message (by thread): Please publish.
- Next message (by thread): Please publish.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Thu Feb 24 19:30:46 CET 2000
> Yes, or a footnote explaining how to turn them off ? I would like to strongly advocate publishing this document as-is: o Weighing cost vs. benefit it is better to have some warnings produced by missing $TTL statements than errors introduced by $TTL statements in older BIND versions. Recommendation of the use of the ``latest'' version nonwithstanding. Please remember the working title and that the target audience may not be expected to fetch and compile those ``latest'' versions themselves. o A design criterion was that the document be ``short''. Any further discussion about peculiarities of certain major or minor releases is not helpful. o While there is an issue with $TTL, the document in its current state is not broken. There is always some issue not covered in all detail, but that's by design. o Even RIPE documents are not set in stone. Should the operational experience with that document suggest that the $TTL or any other issue do not work out, we can and should review and maybe revise it. o With regard to working group economics I would prefer a living (i.e. published and hopefully used in real life) document over a draft that circulates forever heading for perfection and never hits a ``real end user''. We need that kind of feedback. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): Please publish.
- Next message (by thread): Please publish.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]