This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Recommendations for DNS
- Previous message (by thread): Recommendations for DNS
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at ISI.EDU
bmanning at ISI.EDU
Tue Sep 22 18:10:46 CEST 1998
> > Bill Manning <bmanning at ISI.EDU> wrote: > > > > > On top of that, I suggest to clearly describe the requirement to quote > > > any "leading" dot(s) that are *not* supposed to be converted to an '@' > > > character. > > > Like in wilfried\.woeber.univie.ac.at ! > > > > > > Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at > > > > > > While this particular hack works, it is a clear violation of the spec. > > > > --bill > > > Which specs? At least this recommendation is part of RFC 1912: > > 2.2 SOA records > > In the SOA record of every zone, remember to fill in the e-mail > address that will get to the person who maintains the DNS at your > site (commonly referred to as "hostmaster"). The `@' in the e-mail > must be replaced by a `.' first. Do not try to put an `@' sign in > this address. If the local part of the address already contains a > `.' (e.g., John.Smith at widget.xx), then you need to quote the `.' by > preceding it with `\' character. (e.g., to become > John\.Smith.widget.xx) Alternately (and preferred), you can just use > the generic name `hostmaster', and use a mail alias to redirect it to > the appropriate persons. There exists software which uses this field > to automatically generate the e-mail address for the zone contact. > This software will break if this field is improperly formatted. It > is imperative that this address get to one or more real persons, > because it is often used for everything from reporting bad DNS data > to reporting security incidents. > > Andreas Ok, I was overly zelous in my reading of RFC1035. I like what Dave has published in RFC1912. --bill
- Previous message (by thread): Recommendations for DNS
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]