This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

DNS recommendations - the paper

• Previous message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper
• Next message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Elmar K. Bins ekb at ivm.net
Wed Nov 25 11:31:42 CET 1998

randy at psg.com (Randy Bush) wrote:

> > The Bat Book advises you to always add MX records
> 
> poor and unnecessary advice.

Opinions may differ here...

> i think we all agree that, if X can not receive mail directly, there should
> be an MX for X pointing to an SMTP server.
> 
> the point is that, if X runs an SMTP server, then there is no need for an MX
> for X.

There is a need if you want to provide failsafe SMTP service. No MX records,
no fallback mailer (like "no hands, no cookies")...

Elmi.

• Previous message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper
• Next message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]