This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP
- Previous message (by thread): VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP
- Next message (by thread): VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vered Nimrod
nim at tadirantele.com
Thu Apr 23 15:36:31 CEST 1998
Do you happen to have the URL address for IETF ? * A user calling from a "net phone" would use a host name in the form 7.9.3.3.6.2.9.3.2.7.9.tpc.int to call the phone number +972-3-9263397 belonging to a "regular" PSTN (i.e. domain name is The manner that you are suggesting will be hard to use for the end user. Which will prefer to enter the DN and let the system’s network management to the resolving work. It might be the case for the universal IPNP system to behave in the manner that you are describing, but the end user still need a simplified way to enter the DN. ---------------------------------------- Eng. Nimrod Vered , B.Sc. E.E.E. VoIP Project Manager ======================== Tadiran Telecommunication Business and Access Division Tel/Fax : 972-3-9263397 E-Mail :nim at tadirantele.com ---------------------------------------- " Reality Starts With A Dream... ! " -----Original Message----- From: Berislav Todorovic [SMTP:BERI at etf.bg.ac.yu] Sent: ה אפריל 23 1998 16:22 To: nim at tadirantele.com Cc: dns-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP >> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 13:07:42 +0200 >> From: Vered Nimrod <nim at tadirantele.com> >> Subject: VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP >> >> Is there any work being done on the above subject ? IETF has a working group dealing with IP Telephony, but I'm not sure whether they are dealing with the mentioned problem, or not. >> There is a need for a universal IPNP (IP Numbering Plan) system. So >> that every equipment that will be connected to the Internet will >> have a unique DN (Directory Number). The solution should rather be sought in the domain name system. And there is already a possible solution to the problem, outlined in the RFC 1530 (Principles of Operation of the TPC.INT Subdomain). This is, of course, my personal view of the matter and just one more idea on the solution to the problem. * A user calling from a "net phone" would use a host name in the form 7.9.3.3.6.2.9.3.2.7.9.tpc.int to call the phone number +972-3-9263397 belonging to a "regular" PSTN (i.e. domain name is the reversed phone number, much like IN-ADDR.ARPA system). In the DNS, there should be an "MX" record pointing to the PSTN/Internet gateway, e.g.: *.*.*.*.*.*.3.2.7.9.tpc.int. IN MX 10 pstn-gw.domain.com. The client application should consult the MX records, find out the name of the gateway and then connect to the gateway - the same way mail clients do. * A user calling from a PSTN should probably use an access code to reach a local PSTN/Internet gateway - which is exactly the way you described. That access code should be assigned by a national telecom authority. Best regards, Beri .-------. | --+-- | Berislav Todorovic, B.Sc.E.E. | E-mail: BERI at etf.bg.ac.yu | /|\ Hostmaster of the YU TLD | |-(-+-)-| School of Electrical Engineering | Phone: (+381-11) 3221-419 | \|/ Bulevar Revolucije 73 | 3370-106 | --+-- | 11000 Belgrade SERBIA, YUGOSLAVIA | Fax: (+381-11) 3248-681 `-------' --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP
- Next message (by thread): VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]