This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
SLD starting with digit (or containing only digits)
- Previous message (by thread): SLD starting with digit (or containing only digits)
- Next message (by thread): SLD starting with digit (or containing only digits)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Fri Oct 10 16:35:48 CEST 1997
> I would be grateful if someone could tell me what problems could arise > by permitting domain names starting with a digit, or even containing > *only* digits, under a TLD. > > I know this is not in accordance with RFC952. My question really is RFC952 was updated by RFC1123, so names starting with a digit are perfectly legal (technically). At all, we have to differentiate between host and domain names, with the latter being very little restrictions placed upon. However, most domain names wrt second level domains are intended to become (part of) hostnames. You will have to avoid host names that could be interpreted as IP addresses. > what technical problems could be expected if a TLD were to decide that > it allows the above (and currently the required domain name length is only > two characters). I do not understand this additional restriction. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): SLD starting with digit (or containing only digits)
- Next message (by thread): SLD starting with digit (or containing only digits)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]