This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
- Previous message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex.Bligh
amb at xara.net
Tue Jan 14 19:05:41 CET 1997
> On the other hand, following recommendations to us, our intention is > to put a root name server in a class C by itself. There has been a > lot of discussion in this area, and this is what I understand to be > the recommended policy. We don't care what AS this class C is in; > on the whole we would probably prefer that it not be in one of our > ASs. At the risk of AOL-ism, I too prefer the consensus agreement reached by all the LINX members who were at the AGM. Just because all LINX members currently peer with VBC, this does not mean that new members will be allowed to, want to, or that current members will continue to be allowed to / continue to want to. As I understand it, the latest IETF & IEPG proposals suggest that the servers should be at exchange points transitted by several people and run in a neutral manner (apologies if this a misrepresentation), not transitted by a single member, albeit from a point close to an IXP. As far as I know the LINX proposal has always been on the table modulo the issue of whether .com etc. where secondaried there as well as '.' and the transit bandwidth implications thereof. Alex Bligh Xara Networks
- Previous message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]