This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Position on ITLDs
- Previous message (by thread): Position on ITLDs
- Next message (by thread): Position on ITLDs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dave Morton
Dave.Morton at ecrc.de
Thu Oct 10 15:06:43 CEST 1996
> > Dave Morton <Dave.Morton at ecrc.de> writes: > > Daniel - no - not *you* personally but the NCC.....that was also > > Wilfried's suggestion as I understood it. > >The NCC cannot *consult* for them because there would be a clear conflict >of interest were we to accept work and money from the comission. Hmm, I see now what you mean. Well at least point them to someone who is competent instead of having them end up with some twit of a Brussels consultant who as Wilfried pointed out will probably produce the predictable results. >Of course we can (and will) provide them with information once we know >enough about the purpose of this to convince me that I can defend this >towards the contributors. Ok - fine. Perhaps you need to have a new RIPE work item called "Reeducating the Commission" :-). It would after all be part of the lobbying/training function discussed already by the contributors. >Are we communicating? Yep. Cheers, Dave >DAniel
- Previous message (by thread): Position on ITLDs
- Next message (by thread): Position on ITLDs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]