This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Domain object template
- Previous message (by thread): Domain object template
- Next message (by thread): Domain object template
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marten Terpstra
Marten.Terpstra at ripe.net
Wed Jan 11 14:47:53 CET 1995
* Can we please drop the possibility of allowing IP numbers here? * If one of the secondaries of your domain changes IP number, then * he has the nearly impossible task of finding all these outdated * references. Bind only allows hostnames here; I think it is a good * idea to restrict the database in the same way. * * => IP numbers were allowed in the previous template then we need * a general agreement before dropping this possibility... Perhaps we should try and completely overhaul the domain object? Why would we go for small changes when we may need major changes? * => there is a loose binding between names and addresses. * This attribute can be used if someone'd like to describe it. * This attribute has been made optional then you use it only * if you like. Hmm, personally I'd bin the attribute..... -Marten
- Previous message (by thread): Domain object template
- Next message (by thread): Domain object template
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]