This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
recommending use of IN-ADDR.ARPA
- Previous message (by thread): current BIND status
- Next message (by thread): recommending use of IN-ADDR.ARPA
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net
Fri Mar 11 16:45:55 CET 1994
Folks, what does the DNS WG think about recommending usage of in-addr.arpa for router networks in order to facilitate problem diagnostics? Daniel Date: Wed, 9 Mar 94 22:00:49 +0100 From: Philippe-Andre Prindeville <philipp at res.enst.fr> Message-Id: <9403092100.AA20616 at davis.res.enst.fr> To: Marten.Terpstra at ripe.net Subject: Missing IN-ADDR.ARPA records Resent-To: hostmaster at ripe.net Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 1994 10:14:18 +0100 Resent-From: Marten Terpstra <Marten.Terpstra at ripe.net> Hi Marten, I was wondering if you could tell me something: for almost a year, I've been asking Renater regularly to install a name server for their IN-ADDR.ARPA zones for their routers. They've been (in the past) telling me that it was planned but they haven't gotten around to doing it. Well, the shoe has dropped. They've abandoned all pretenses of ever intending to install IN-ADDR.ARPA zones to the name servers. It simply will never happen. For users and network operators alike, this is a serious problem if we can't at least pin-point the locality of network outages. What political recourse does RIPE (or EBONE) have to bring Renater into line? Is there an "authority" I can complain to? Thanks, -Philip
- Previous message (by thread): current BIND status
- Next message (by thread): recommending use of IN-ADDR.ARPA
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]