in-addr.arpa zone data in RIPE database

> 
>     	Interaction is fine. But RIPE stepping into someone else's
> 	authority is quite something different!
>     I don't see any problem with that as long as we (european
>     networking people) agree to send update to the RIPE-NCC
>     instead of sending them to the NIC.
> RIPE-DB and DNS are entirely different objects. 
Yes, indeed. Nonetheless I think it would be extremely useful for network
managers in Europe to send their DNS updates to the RIPE-NCC only, knowing
that they interface the NIC about the DNS root servers updates.

Daniel, you can poll RIPErs on this, can you?

> I would
> like RIPE to notify me *in some cases* about discrepancies
> between my entries in the RIPE-DB and my DNS entries, but
> I do *NOT* want RIPE to step into my authority by asking
> or telling the NIC to change *MY* DNS info because they
> found discrepancies: I may well have good reason why those
> discrepancies exist.
If someone in Europe likes to have discrepancies, for whatever reason,
he can certainly tell to RIPE-NCC: please do not forward my updates
to the NIC!

----------                                                     ----------
Antonio_Blasco Bonito                          E-Mail: bonito at nis.garr.it
GARR - Network Information Service      c=it;a=garr;p=garr;o=nis;s=bonito
c/o CNUCE - Istituto del CNR                         Tel: +39 (50) 593246
Via S. Maria, 36                                    Telex: 500371 CNUCE I
56126 PISA   Italy                                   Fax: +39 (50) 904052
----------                                                     ----------