This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Suggestion from Piet Beertema
- Previous message (by thread): Suggestion from Piet Beertema
- Next message (by thread): Suggestion from Piet Beertema
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piet Beertema
Piet.Beertema at cwi.nl
Wed Jul 22 17:34:12 CEST 1992
What I was thinking of was the "*n[io]" - tag already used. (e.g: *ni: 1=701 2=1800 3=1238 ) Hmmm, I doubt whether the *n[io] would be adequate to unequivocally identify the network service providers for a given network, but I can't think right away of a good [counter]example. As far as I remember there is a "*di" - tag for domain name entries listing IP adresses used in this domain. Hence no usual "nslookup"! A "*di" tag may ever have been proposed, but I don't see it in any of the RIPE templates. Don't misunderstand me!! I don't want to keep out *useful* information. I just want to minimize and streamline the DB. Then we're operating on the same wavelength. Piet
- Previous message (by thread): Suggestion from Piet Beertema
- Next message (by thread): Suggestion from Piet Beertema
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]