[diversity] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review

Hello Leo,

I’m fine with the current draft if the comment I made is addressed (and depending on how comments from others are integrated).
“Support” feels like a big word, because this document is functionally incomplete without the other documents. I know that splitting into parts is the process that has been decided on, so that’s not something we can easily change now.

Sasha

> On 29 Mar 2021, at 10:30, Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear RIPE Community,
> 
> I'd like to thank everyone who has already commented on this draft update to the Code of Conduct so far.  
> 
> I have been keeping track of the comments so the TF has a good idea of what changes we need to make to the draft. I've tabulated them below and it would be good if people could let me know if I have misunderstood what they meant. Also, some people have commented but not stated if they support the daft as is, or would support the draft with a minor change. I've placed a question mark next to names where I'm not sure what a person's position is. It would be great if you could clarify your position.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Leo Vegoda
> On behalf of the RIPE Code of Conduct TF
> 
> Commenter
> Support
> Comment or Delta
> Eileen Gallagher
> ✓
> Add: acknowledgments of earlier work done by others when presenting new work
> Add: thanking people for their contribution as an example of positive behaviour
> Comment: RIPE NCC might want to incorporate the CoC into contracts with venues 
> Randy Bush
> ✓
> Keep the CoC tight
> Vesna Manojlovic
> ✓
> Add: definition of the CoC Team
> Add: call to action
> Nit: Add date and authors
> Nit: Change “for more than quarter of a century” to “since 1989”
> Nit: make the URL ripe.net/coc <http://ripe.net/coc>
> Nit: Rename "Behaviour" title to "Inclusive Behaviour" or another alternative
> Nit: "people protected" -> remove bullet points, make it a CSV line of text
> Gert Doering
> ✓
> —
> Maximilian Wilhelm
> ✓
> —
> Daniel Karrenberg
> ✓
> Focus more on principles and make it even clearer that the lists are examples and not comprehensive
> Do not give the PC a special role 
> Nit: Change “national laws” to “laws”
> Nit: ONly talk about roles and organisations in the community in general terms
> Stated that the obligation to report crimes is very limited
> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> ?
> Nit: Number all sections
> Rationale must balance inclusivity against freedom of speech and cultural differences
> Include all ways of communicating over the Internet
> Does not understand why the PC needs to be consulted
> Does contracted workers include subcontractors?
> Wants the RIPE NCC staff to always intermediate if a report is made to the police and understands that there could be liability if people know of an incident and do not report it
> Add protection for those who do not speak English as a first language
> Does not think "calling people names" is clear for non-native speakers
> Rephrase “Deliberately outing private details about someone without their consent”
> Rephrase “Pushing someone to drink or take drugs”
> Add a prohibition against spam
> Forbid using language a non-native speaker might misunderstand
> Similarly, the CoC Team should accommodate cultural differences
> Wants the process in the same document
> Sasha Romijn
> ?
> Question about how the team would determine if an act should be reported to the police and a preference for that to be controlled by the subject of the act
> Jim Reid
> ?
> Supports Sasha on police report issue
> Sander Steffann
> ?
> Supports Sasha on police report issue
> Gergana Petrova
> ?
> Clarification on making a police report
> Echoes the question about the role of the PC (see above)
> Rob Evans
> ?
> Trusted Contacts training gave him the understanding that there is no obligation to make police reports. Trusted Contacts are confidential contacts
> Fearghas Mckay
> ?
> Confidentiality and control are important in helping people have the confidence to make a report
> 
> _______________________________________________
> diversity mailing list
> diversity at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/diversity/attachments/20210330/29fcea8e/attachment-0001.html>