[diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc

On 2 Sep 2019, at 16:33, Sasha Romijn wrote:

> Hello Daniel,
>
>> On 2 Sep 2019, at 14:26, Daniel Karrenberg <dfk at ripe.net> wrote:
>> We are not commiunicating: My point is that any action taken on 
>> behalf of the community needs a process for appeal and review.
>>
> Do you have a suggestion for where that responsibility should be 
> placed? It should be a small group, and can’t be a single person.
>
> Sasha


No I have no such suggestion at this time and I have neither time nor 
energy.
What is needed is a process that makes decisions independent of
and untainted by the people that made the original decision.
That process also needs time lines.

For examples look at the IETF and similar groups.
Note also that we have just reached consensus on a procedure
to select the RIPE Chair which has a number of different
appeals mechanisms in it for a number of purposes.

Daniel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/diversity/attachments/20190902/32e2d577/attachment.html>