[diversity] [Ext] Draft CoC and response guide

Thanks Amanda! I can certainly bring this up with the relevant PCs for 
the regional meetings.

But, just for my info - is the RIPE PC going to be approving the CoC? I 
wasn't aware they have to. They are responsible for the plenary program, 
but not the meeting itself. So for example all day Wednesday and 
Thursday have nothing to do with them. Here is their Charter for more 
info: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-600).

I thought the CoC is more a question of the RIPE community's 
agreement/concensus (basically this taskforce's mailing list, which 
include the people from the RIPE Community interested on this topic). 
Similar to the way WGs work.

Anybody from RIPE PC can shed light on this? Brian? I hope I'm not 
creating a mess.

Cheers,
Gergana

On 08/04/2019 16:35, Amanda Gowland wrote:
> Hi Gergana,
> 
> It's a good question. But seeing as the ENOG and MENOG and SEE Meetings 
> have their own PCs, I think it's probably something that they would need 
> to adopt on their own accord. Certainly, it would be simple to just 
> adapt one for the RIPE Meeting but it's not within the scope of the TF 
> to do that.
> 
> thx,
> 
> Amanda
> 
> On 08/04/2019 16:30, Gergana Petrova wrote:
>> Hi Sasha, hi all,
>>
>> Just want to join in with thanking you for this excellent CoC draft!
>>
>> Just a general question, as I am not sure if the mandate of the 
>> Transforce covers this. The CoC mentions "Where does the Code of 
>> Conduct apply?" - RIPE meetings. I was wondering if we can include 
>> "RIPE meetings and other events organised by the RIPE NCC such as 
>> ENOG, MENOG, SEE and other regional meetings."
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gergana
>>
>> On 08/04/2019 10:48, Amanda Gowland wrote:
>>> Sasha,
>>>
>>> THANK YOU for contributing such a stellar draft! I've gone through 
>>> and made some edits, some more British spelling-isms + putting some 
>>> of the goals in active tense. I also made the scope (in terms of who 
>>> it applies to) a bit more explicit.
>>>
>>> Warm regards,
>>>
>>> Amanda
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/04/2019 10:36, John Springer wrote:
>>>> I agree, excellent work!
>>>>
>>>> I have suggest some minor edits of the Response guide.
>>>>
>>>> John Springer
>>>> acting solely on my own behalf
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 5:10 AM David Huberman 
>>>> <david.huberman at icann.org <mailto:david.huberman at icann.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Sasha,
>>>>
>>>>     The draft CoC is quite excellent. Nice work!  I have completed a
>>>>     copyediting pass in "suggesting" mode:
>>>>
>>>>     - normalized words to British English spellings (3 instances of
>>>>     behavior were changed to behaviour)
>>>>     - removed contractions
>>>>     - fixed a few typos
>>>>     - enforced consistent paragraph spacing
>>>>     - enforced the Oxford comma
>>>>
>>>>     /david
>>>>     writing solely on his personal behalf
>>>>
>>>>     On 4/5/19, 7:32 AM, "diversity on behalf of Sasha Romijn"
>>>>     <diversity-bounces at ripe.net <mailto:diversity-bounces at ripe.net> on
>>>>     behalf of sasha at mxsasha.eu <mailto:sasha at mxsasha.eu>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Hello all,
>>>>
>>>>         Closely based on the work I did for Write the Docs, with some
>>>>     adjustments to fit the RIPE community, I put together a draft for
>>>>     a CoC and for a response guide.
>>>>
>>>>         CoC:
>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1IAJj9UjW2zroz5v6XQYgYEYotfZlV4Trk2vRdaoPaP4_edit&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=iTOW7nSt3tBCc5xNiHfQNhFilU9Ki9_nVAHGfa3QG5w&m=ag_h5GXVGbSsDgGW59YleMXVaOJnV4ga6CJcCIfZ38A&s=sy8t_T8v902B5ESqiOxzVnu6ezEWJaYUIsfScYJuvyY&e= 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         Response guide:
>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1gaLo4axYDRTpQnhUJyG92EHBmEIkxSDN8Urmy-2Dzn9nQ_edit&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=iTOW7nSt3tBCc5xNiHfQNhFilU9Ki9_nVAHGfa3QG5w&m=ag_h5GXVGbSsDgGW59YleMXVaOJnV4ga6CJcCIfZ38A&s=tLYhKXwOC4CmhGYH2JhF4h-Qy6XZgbV4ujIJt5XPyus&e= 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         I went with Google docs for now, as it’s quite accessible. You
>>>>     can leave comments and suggest changes, and we can discuss broader
>>>>     topics on the mailing list. There are a few parts about structure
>>>>     still to be filled in, but let’s start here.
>>>>         We haven’t really spoken about any of the details, other than
>>>>     a general “this can be a starting point”, so I don’t know what
>>>>     kind of discussions other people would like to bring up.
>>>>
>>>>         Sasha
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         diversity mailing list
>>>>     diversity at ripe.net <mailto:diversity at ripe.net>
>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.ripe.net_mailman_listinfo_diversity&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=iTOW7nSt3tBCc5xNiHfQNhFilU9Ki9_nVAHGfa3QG5w&m=ag_h5GXVGbSsDgGW59YleMXVaOJnV4ga6CJcCIfZ38A&s=BARWpiMNfao6C_dqEoTNumUx0AVYtnpFY2CTnE4YmwA&e= 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     diversity mailing list
>>>>     diversity at ripe.net <mailto:diversity at ripe.net>
>>>>     https://mailman.ripe.net/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> diversity mailing list
>>>> diversity at ripe.net
>>>> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> diversity mailing list
>>> diversity at ripe.net
>>> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> diversity mailing list
>> diversity at ripe.net
>> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> 
>