This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/diversity@ripe.net/
[diversity] Experiences from the Django community
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] Experiences from the Django community
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] Experiences from the Django community
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Malcolm Hutty
malcolm at linx.net
Fri Jul 14 12:56:22 CEST 2017
On 14/07/2017 10:26, Gergana Petrova wrote:
> When a conference organiser is giving a solution 2 + 2 (figuratively
> speaking) to the participants, it might only work for 70%. If then the
> organiser also offers solution 1 + 3, this is NOT discriminating against
> the 70%, but only treating the remaining 30% equally.
I've always been sceptical about "separate but equal", but YMMV.
Did you have any thoughts on my proposal?
--
Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
London Internet Exchange Ltd
Monument Place, 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ
Company Registered in England No. 3137929
Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] Experiences from the Django community
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] Experiences from the Django community
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]