This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[diversity] [Ext] Notes from the RIPE Diversity Task Force on-line meeting, 27.6.2017
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] [Ext] Notes from the RIPE Diversity Task Force on-line meeting, 27.6.2017
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] [Ext] Notes from the RIPE Diversity Task Force on-line meeting, 27.6.2017
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Malcolm Hutty
malcolm at linx.net
Fri Jul 7 18:41:49 CEST 2017
On 07/07/2017 16:58, Brian Nisbet wrote: >> Intersectionality as a doctrine is closely associated with allegations >> that Western societies are riddled with oppression, [snip] > This is stunning derailing, Malcolm, sorry. Intersectionality is the > concept that various forms of oppression & bigotry are all interlinked > and, well, intersectional. To go from accusing me of derailing, in one sentence, to confirming my point in the next, is itself pretty stunning. I take this as your simply wishing to signal your distaste for my pointing out that this doctrine is considered controversial and offensive by many, because it is a doctrine with which you happen to sympathise. > I do not believe that talking about the patriarchy (from which you and I > both benefit immensely) is extreme or alleged. Well, we're obviously not going to agree about that. So we can either (a) argue about it interminably, or (b) agree that this isn't something for RIPE to getting into. If you fancy that there is an option (c), adopt your position and align the view that the patriarchy exists and "you and I benefit from it immensely", and ignore Malcolm's view to the contrary, well then we've got a problem. > I'm still not sure what term we should use instead, of course, nor why > we should try to invent ones where perfectly good terms already exist. Well I hope I've already shown that "intersectionality" is not a perfectly good term. As for a better term that already exists, I would suggest "sex discrimination": as long as RIPE avoids that, and treats everyone as an individual and not as a member of a preferred or dis-preferred identity group, then we will have done what we ought to do. Malcolm. -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd Monument Place, 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] [Ext] Notes from the RIPE Diversity Task Force on-line meeting, 27.6.2017
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] [Ext] Notes from the RIPE Diversity Task Force on-line meeting, 27.6.2017
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]