This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[diversity] [Ext] Notes from the RIPE Diversity Task Force on-line meeting, 27.6.2017
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] [Ext] Notes from the RIPE Diversity Task Force on-line meeting, 27.6.2017
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] [Ext] Notes from the RIPE Diversity Task Force on-line meeting, 27.6.2017
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Fri Jul 7 16:51:44 CEST 2017
Hi, Denis wrote: > I have nothing against measurements. I have a lot against taking > measurements in a way that is not anonymous, as in the case of > this survey. That can be dangerous. I agree that the act of measurement and the use of the data need to be of the highest standards, so that people can feel confident that the data will not be misused. Are there not good practices that can be copied? Regards, Leo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4988 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/diversity/attachments/20170707/9cdbbbe0/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] [Ext] Notes from the RIPE Diversity Task Force on-line meeting, 27.6.2017
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] [Ext] Notes from the RIPE Diversity Task Force on-line meeting, 27.6.2017
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]