<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38447"><span>Hi all</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38506"><span></span></div><div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div class="yahoo_quoted" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38454" style="display: block;"> <div style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38453"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, Sans-Serif; font-size: 16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38452"> <div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38451"> <font id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38450" size="2" face="Arial"> <hr id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38449" size="1"> <b id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38458"><span style="font-weight:bold;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38457">From:</span></b> Nick Hilliard via db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> <br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> Database WG <db-wg@ripe.net><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, 12 December 2017, 23:16<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [db-wg] NWI-5 Out of region ROUTE(6)/AUT-NUM objects implementation request<br> </font> </div> <div class="y_msg_container" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38461"><br><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38463">Tim Bruijnzeels via db-wg wrote:<br clear="none">> Dear working group,<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> We are tasked by the co-chairs on 19 October 2017 to come up with an<br clear="none">> implementation proposal for NWI-5.<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">> One final issue that hasn't been addressed: should it be possible for<br clear="none">> new objects to be created with source: RIPE-NONAUTH? My preference<br clear="none">> would be not, but this is something that we might want to discuss in the<br clear="none"><div class="yqt0072884118" id="yqtfd40840">> working group.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38554"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38556">Before answering this question, perhaps Tim you can say if it will still be possible to create foreign ROUTE objects after this implementation?</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38558"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38584">Currently there are place holder INET(6)NUM objects in the RIPE Database covering all non RIPE address space. These objects have an "mnt-routes:" attribute referencing the MNTNER object with the public password. This is necessary to (by)pass the address space auth requirements for creating ROUTE(6) objects. Do you plan to make any changes to this mechanism/arrangement with this implementation?</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38708"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38710">cheers</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38723">denis</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38725">co-chair DB WG</div><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1513116385906_38727"><br></div><br clear="none">> Nick<div class="yqt0072884118" id="yqtfd25141"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div></div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></body></html>