<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 13/05/2015 17:24, Robert Kisteleki
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:55536CB2.8090901@ripe.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 2015-05-13 11:24, Job Snijders wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Yesterday during the birds of a feather session about "cross-registry
authorisation" the idea to relax the authorisation requirements for
route-object creation was brought up (again). I ask this group to further
explore.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
To be fair, there were a total of four alternatives presented, of which the
above was one. I had the feeling in the room that all alternatives had
supporters as well as opposers. Maybe it'd be fair to explore the other
alternatives at the same depth as well?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Including my fifth alternative....<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
denis<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:55536CB2.8090901@ripe.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Cheers,
Robert
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>