<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font size="+1"><tt>Hi All<br>
<br>
The abuse contact policy ripe-563 states "</tt></font><font
size="+1"><tt>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
Internet number resources need to have an “abuse-c:” attribute."
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-563">https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-563</a><br>
This means all resources subject to RIPE policies must have an
"abuse-c:" reference. Although the RIPE NCC has confirmed some
are still missing this, the majority now have an "abuse-c:" set
up and the missing ones can be addressed.<br>
<br>
Tools provided by the RIPE NCC to find the abuse contact for a
resource (RIPEstat, Abuse Finder) only search for "abuse-c:"
data. Historically the "abuse-mailbox:" attribute was allowed in
five object types - PERSON, ROLE, MNTNER, ORGANISATION, IRT.
These other references may now hold stale data and can only be
found if anyone manually queries the database and follows many
references out from a resource object.<br>
<br>
A cleanup was proposed in the impact analysis for ripe-563</tt></font><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2011-06">https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2011-06</a><br>
"
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
In order to clean up existing data, the RIPE NCC will notify the
users and convert "abuse-mailbox:" attributes into "remarks:" in any
object other than <b>role</b> objects."<br>
<br>
As it is now a few years since this was discussed and agreed I think
it wise to propose the cleanup again and reaffirm this is the way to
go.<br>
<br>
I therefore propose the RIPE NCC converts all "abuse-mailbox:"
attributes into "remarks:" attributes in PERSON, MNTNER,
ORGANISATION and IRT objects. Then deprecates this attribute from
these object types.<br>
<br>
I further propose that any "abuse-mailbox:" attribute in a ROLE
object, where the ROLE object is not referenced by any "abuse-c:"
attribute, and has not been referenced for at least 90 days, is also
converted into "remarks:". This will help to clean up historical
"abuse-mailbox:" attributes that existed in ROLE objects before
"abuse-c:" was introduced.<br>
<br>
The original cleanup proposal was part of the impact analysis for
ripe-563 and so it has already been through the PDP process and
agreed. So I don't think this needs to go through the PDP again and
can be agreed by consensus in the DB WG, unless anyone thinks
otherwise.<br>
<br>
Comments appreciated.<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
Denis Walker<br>
Independent Netizen<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>