<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+1"><tt>Dear Janos<br>
<br>
As Job pointed out we can phase in such a change. So if it is
decided to remove the "changed:" atribute, as well as
communicating such a change by various means, we could adjust
the software so that any object submitted for update containing
a "changed:" attribute will have it stripped out by the software
with a Warning message added to the ack response. This would
prevent any update script from failing.<br>
<br>
If anyone has scripts that read the "changed:" values and expect
to find them, these scripts would break anyway if the attribute
is made optional and someone chooses to remove them from their
data.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Denis Walker<br>
Business Analyst<br>
RIPE NCC Database Team<br>
<br>
</tt></font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/04/2014 15:25, Janos Zsako wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:534FD667.2050308@iszt.hu" type="cite">Dear
all,
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Making changed: entirely optional, and
possibly recommend against using it
<br>
for new entries, that is something I would be fine with.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I fully agree with Gert here. I am sure deleting the "changed:"
attribute
<br>
would break quite a few scripts.
<br>
<br>
Best regards,
<br>
Janos
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Gert Doering
<br>
-- NetMaster
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>