This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] So what happened last night to the DB?

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] So what happened last night to the DB?
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] So what happened last night to the DB?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Clement Cavadore clement at cavadore.net
Mon Jun 17 07:40:21 CEST 2024

Hello Hank,

Same here. I am using (more than) one of the included maintainer in
that dummy object. I guess blake66@ it the original creator of that
dummy object, and that ak@ is the one who erased the useless object.

I have thought about doing it so, as I was also included as the
maintainers of the object. The real question is: why did blake66 made
such an object ? And how could we prevent something alike to happen
again (not an easy question -- maybe limiting the amount of mnt-by ?)

Regards,

Clément Cavadore

On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 07:33 +0300, Hank Nussbacher via db-wg wrote:
> Hello.
>  
>  I am assuming that I am not the only one with 80+ DB updates in
> their inbox this morning.
>  I have attached just a small sampling of 3 to this email.
>  Who are blake66 at live.co.uk or ak at dataline.ua?
>  
>  Thanks,
>  Hank 
>

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] So what happened last night to the DB?
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] So what happened last night to the DB?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]