[db-wg] So what happened last night to the DB?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] So what happened last night to the DB?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] So what happened last night to the DB?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clement Cavadore
clement at cavadore.net
Mon Jun 17 07:40:21 CEST 2024
Hello Hank, Same here. I am using (more than) one of the included maintainer in that dummy object. I guess blake66@ it the original creator of that dummy object, and that ak@ is the one who erased the useless object. I have thought about doing it so, as I was also included as the maintainers of the object. The real question is: why did blake66 made such an object ? And how could we prevent something alike to happen again (not an easy question -- maybe limiting the amount of mnt-by ?) Regards, Clément Cavadore On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 07:33 +0300, Hank Nussbacher via db-wg wrote: > Hello. > > I am assuming that I am not the only one with 80+ DB updates in > their inbox this morning. > I have attached just a small sampling of 3 to this email. > Who are blake66 at live.co.uk or ak at dataline.ua? > > Thanks, > Hank >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] So what happened last night to the DB?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] So what happened last night to the DB?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]