[db-wg] First round of cleanup of Database WG NWIs

On Wed, 3 Jul 2024, denis walker via db-wg wrote:

(...)
> The high cost and low (if any) benefit of splitting this data is
> completely pointless. Or maybe it will be split on object types. But
> given that few people are likely to be querying the history of some of
> the object types, like maybe set objects and poems, does it still make
> any sense? Do we really have a problem making such a small range of
> data items available to anyone who is interested in this operational
> data? If there is a concern that some personal data still slips
> through, maybe in descr:, then perhaps it needs another legal review,
> not a redesign.
>
> My recommendation is that we drop NWI-17.
>
> cheers
> denis
(...)

I agree with Denis and i support dropping NWI-17.

Regards,
Carlos