This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Phone number requirement for person objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Phone number requirement for person objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Phone number requirement for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Hessler
phessler at theapt.org
Wed Jan 17 17:17:25 CET 2024
On 2024 Jan 17 (Wed) at 17:08:38 +0100 (+0100), Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote: :Hi, : :In the DB-WG interim session I mentioned that there's currently a :discrepancy between person objects and role objects with regards to :contact information. :More specifically, person objects currently require a phone number :while role objects require an email address. : :I think we should try to bring person objects more in line with role :objects by removing the phone number requirement. Ideally I would want :it to be mandatory to have either a phone number or an email address :in order to not lose any flexibility but I'm not sure if that is :possible. : :During the session I asked if anyone was opposed to the idea and no :one said they were so I would assume that this is relatively :uncontroversial but please let me know what you think. : :-Cynthia Fully agreed. And while we are at it, address attributes should be made optional for person and role objects. -- Nasrudin walked into a teahouse and declaimed, "The moon is more useful than the sun." "Why?", he was asked. "Because at night we need the light more."
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Phone number requirement for person objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Phone number requirement for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]