This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Netmaster (exAS286)
netmaster at as286.net
Tue Nov 15 10:00:59 CET 2022
> Job Snijders wrote on Monday, November 14, 2022 6:41 PM: > I think the solution is to - GOING FORWARD - disallow creation of new > AS-SET objects which follow the 'short' naming style. Forcing people to something they could already make use of? Wouldn't mind ... for sure it's minimizing the accidental collision of set names (esp. in other RRs). > The RIPE database engine blocking creation of short-named AS-SETs > might help nudge the industry towards making hierarchical naming > the norm. If others follow. But even if all "important" ones follow - and as Cynthia wrote - as long as RADB and other "open" major RRs are around - the abuse of *evil* person registering the aut-num and a bad as-set would be still possible. So not a final solution, just improving the situation. Markus
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]