This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Wed May 25 20:58:41 CEST 2022
Hi, On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 8:28 PM Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:04 AM Cynthia Revström <me at cynthia.re> wrote: > > > > I forgot to mention this > > > > > [...], why should we dictate what the mandatory technology is? > > > > I kinda agree with you here if you by "we" mean the db-wg, this might be a larger question that should involve multiple other working groups too. But the RIPE community should decide this imo. > > I think that the reason phone was mandatory is that it was the > de-facto standard. I agree that e-mail is now. But will it remain so? > If we are building for the future then we should consider the > possibility that the future will look different from today. It might not remain the standard but I also don't think it makes sense to plan for the future too much here as it is a relatively simple thing to change in the future if/when that happens. Yes we can consider the possibility but I don't think it really changes anything for what we do right now given how minimal it really is in terms of change. -Cynthia
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]