This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed May 25 17:07:03 CEST 2022
Hi, On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 04:50:57PM +0200, Cynthia Revström wrote: > P.S. Yes all of these networks could just use role objects and as such > not have to publish phone numbers but I argued for why they shouldn't > be required as it seemed to me like Gert didn't quite understand why I > think it is a bad idea to require them, beyond the inconsistency. Maybe I expressed myself badly. I was primarily describing my use case "why would I want to look at *anything* in the RIPE-DB" - and that is, usually, because something is broken and I find myself in the need to contact people. In that situation, their network might be broken (or mine, or something in between) so e-mail or a web form might just not work - this is why we have a phone system. If nothing is broken, I do not look at person or role objects at all. That said, of course having "no phone number" is a better data set than "a phone number that looks good to the DB but is useless" :-) *That* said - if people do not want to be contacted about issues with their network, then we should ask ourselves if putting these contacts into the RIPE-DB is the correct thing to do - phone numbers or not - to me this is the prime reason we store contact data there, to reach responsible persons/teams when there is something with their network that needs attention. On this particular discussion: I agree that it makes no sense to have the phone number optional on a role: (*this* is usually a NOC that has a phone...) and mandatory on a person: - make it optional on both. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20220525/811cbd3c/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]