This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Decision on NWI-2 Historical queries
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-2 Historical queries
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed May 18 12:47:40 CEST 2022
In message <20220518080503.qqip2zgrggnebdt4 at danton.fire-world.de>, Sebastian Wiesinger <sebastian at karotte.org> wrote: >You HAVE the right to >have your information removed from the RIPE database. Is that a blanket rule, covering all possible information? Forgive me, but I have to ask, because what I am reading here: https://support.google.com/legal/answer/10769224?hl=en suggests certain rather large limitations to this right, as it exists, under law. In particular, the above reference appears to suggest that the right does not exist for corporate rather than "natural person" information, and also, the right, such as it is, under law, would seem to also be conditioned on the question of whether or not the continued publication of the information might be in the public interest. Have they just gotten it wrong? Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Decision on NWI-2 Historical queries
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] phone number required for person objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]