This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Updating Descr part of object with # results in No Operation
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Updating Descr part of object with # results in No Operation
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Updating Descr part of object with # results in No Operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Janos Zsako
zsako at nic.hu
Tue Jun 21 11:38:45 CEST 2022
Dear Sascha, Generally speaking it is a good idea to avoid using the comment character (#) in the attribute fields (descr in this case), unless you use it for a comment indeed. In your example I have the impression that # is intended to stand for "number". Best regards, Janos Zsako On 21/06/2022 11:17, Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > This is intentional behaviour, any comment is not considered part of the attribute value. > > If you only update a comment, the object is considered to be identical to what it was before (i.e. there has been no significant change). > > The workaround as you mentioned is to change something else at the same time. > > Regards > Ed Shryane > RIPE NCC > > >> On 21 Jun 2022, at 10:11, Sascha E. Pollok via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I just tripped over something today which I have never noticed after >20 years of using the RIPE DB :-) It might be explained somewhere but I haven't found anything so here it is. >> >> I am updating an inetnum object from: >> >> descr: Testobject Ticket #12345 >> to >> descr: Testobject Ticket #123456 >> >> using Syncupdate. This results in a "No Operation" (Warning: Submitted object identical to database object). Is this intentional? It works if I remove the # and add it again in a second step. I assume it's something about it being interpreted as a comment but even if that's the case, I should still be able to update it. >> >> Can someone enlighten me? >> >> Thank you and best regards >> Sascha >> >> -- >> >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/ > >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Updating Descr part of object with # results in No Operation
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Updating Descr part of object with # results in No Operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]