This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/

[db-wg] rfc2770

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Havard Eidnes he at uninett.no
Thu Jun 2 21:00:46 CEST 2022

> Sure, I know this. Now there is a global lack of IPv4 address space,
> so things can be changed. I would like to try. And may be to push some
> things globally.
>
> I do not know any example of 233 net usage like it was designed. Are
> there any?

Yes, there are.

If you want to re-assign 233/8 to unicast usage, I suggest this
be done the proper way (through the IETF and IANA), not just by
sqatting on it with a different type of usage and trying to
intimidate others to dance to your pipe.

Regards,

- Håvard

Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770
Next message (by thread): [db-wg] rfc2770

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]