[db-wg] NWI-13 Geofeed Legal Analysis

On Fri, 29 Jul 2022, 16:04 Massimo Candela, <massimo at ntt.net> wrote:

>
>
> I'm not against making the purpose of the database more explicit towards
> geolocation data. I was just commenting that I don't see why the current
> generic purposes are not good enough (especially since we have a bunch
> of other attributes, including "geoloc").
>

My argument is that none of that bunch of attributes are explicitly covered
by the current purposes in a clear and obvious way.


>
> On 29/07/2022 11:22, denis walker wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Geofeed wants to correct geolocation problems. The geofeed attribute is
> >> exactly a way to "coordinate between network operators" (with, or
> >> without, the intermediation of geolocation providers). Geolocation
> >> problems impact the availability/performance of content/services. The
> >> medium is the network. Geolocation problems are network problems.
> >
> > No, "geofeed:" is not covered by this purpose. It may be provided by
> > network operators but it is not 'used' by them.
>
> And by who is used?
>

I think I've been suitably corrected on this point :)

Cheers
denis
Co- chair DB-WG


> > It has nothing to do
> > with 'network problem resolution
>
> This is a weird statement. The network has a physical/geographical
> component, is not just topology and protocols.
>
> We have CDNs doing great moneys by offering solutions to this problem.
>
> > It is, as
> > I suggested, data that is used by external services.
>
> The data is not -used- by external services!
>
> There are external services, like geolocation providers, aggregating it,
> but the data is -used- by other network operators on the other side.
>
> Even more, some operators started collecting geofeed data directly,
> without the intermediation of geolocation providers. A great example of
> it is Google.
>
> The producer and the final user is always a network operator.
>
> ISP -> content
> content -> CDN
> content -> transit
> ISP -> geoloc provider -> content
> etc.
>
>
> Ciao,
> Massimo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20220729/264506e1/attachment.html>