[db-wg] Non-RIPE INRs in an Example returned by RIPE Whois DB Query Service

I don't think I really made any big comment so I am guessing it was
that but if a /16 wasn't needed for demonstration purposes, I prefer
using the documentation specific prefixes (as you mentioned) of
course.

-Cynthia

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:09 PM Edward Shryane via db-wg
<db-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> > On 11 Jul 2022, at 19:48, Sylvain Baya <abscoco at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear RIPE DB-WG,
> >
> > Please find my comments below, inline...
> > Thanks!
> >
> ...
> > btw, now, have you considered the issue raised by Cynthia?
> >
>
> Can you clarify please? Do you mean Cynthia's comment, "there is no /16 for documentation purposes afaik" ?
>
> I'm using the documentation /24's as examples of valid and invalid prefixes, not as examples of holes.
>
> Regards
> Ed Shryane
> RIPE NCC
>
>
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/