This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] geofeed issue: can't add geofeed attribute to PI /48
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] geofeed issue: can't add geofeed attribute to PI /48
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] geofeed issue: can't add geofeed attribute to PI /48
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elad Cohen
elad at netstyle.io
Tue Feb 22 00:52:07 CET 2022
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 UNSUBSCRIBE ------- Original Message ------- On Tuesday, February 22nd, 2022 at 1:50, Cynthia Revström via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Hi, > > My opinions on this can probably be summed up with me pretty much > > entirely agreeing with Job, Randy, and mostly with Gert. > > With regards to Gert's reply I would just like to say that I think > > trying to decide who is and isn't a legal entity is something really > > complicated and last I checked the NCC didn't seem to be great at it. > > Some kinds of legal structures like partnerships or associations might > > be legal entities in some jurisdictions but not in others. > > I think a better argument here is that being able to create an > > inet(6)num object with a tech-c/admin-c that has someone's personal > > details in it but no ability to put a geofeed attribute in it due to > > the prefix size seems like an extremely weird situation. > > If the NCC legal team thinks this makes sense then I would love to > > hear how on earth they think it makes more sense to publish someone's > > name, address, and phone number, than to publish a URL that might > > contain the location of the device(s) using that IP address (which the > > NCC doesn't publish directly). (especially as I think people would > > rarely make it more specific than a city or borough) > > -Cynthia > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 9:06 PM Randy Bush via db-wg db-wg at ripe.net wrote: > > > hi ed: > > > > one step forward, one back. > > > > in a previous life, i was a programming language hacker snd compiler > > > > writer. we used to make very strong negative review of any proposals > > > > to muck about with semantics in comment fields. just don't. > > > > randy > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/ > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wnUEARYKAAYFAmIUJZoAIQkQj6WtEth1vqMWIQQHtrd3aktNVejGGPiPpa0S 2HW+o58XAQDj8M/ZeHJoNpmLQC09FfoUhjERqkJJxGV/zhyCNHvAtAEAwRT1 gQXSV7DFkNqA5ji9Lsi4PeV1QIT+HJ3wlYQkkg0= =iX29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] geofeed issue: can't add geofeed attribute to PI /48
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] geofeed issue: can't add geofeed attribute to PI /48
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]