This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] geofeed issue: can't add geofeed attribute to PI /48
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] geofeed issue: can't add geofeed attribute to PI /48
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] geofeed issue: can't add geofeed attribute to PI /48
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at fastly.com
Mon Feb 21 19:49:13 CET 2022
Dear Ed, WG, Thank you for the update! On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 03:56:00PM +0100, Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote: > Accordingly, we will allow "geofeed:" on ALLOCATED PA or top-level > ASSIGNED PI (for IPv4) and ALLOCATED-BY-RIR on top-level ASSIGNED PI > (for IPv6). Perhaps a typo slipped in: I assume "on top-level" in the above sentence was meant to read "or top-level"? > We will also start enforcing the same validation on "remarks: geofeed" > as on "geofeed:" for consistency. I guess imposing restrictions on the contents on "remarks:" fields serves to counter the argument "no such restriction exists for the remarks: field", offered in the initial posting [1]. In effect this means the flexibility of the "remarks:" field is being downgraded because of a dispute between db-wg at ripe.net and the RIPE NCC legal team. I don't see much benefit to that aspect of the proposed course of action. I'd like to suggest this NEW and ADDITIONAL restriction is reconsidered. Kind regards, Job [1]: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2022-January/007246.html
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] geofeed issue: can't add geofeed attribute to PI /48
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] geofeed issue: can't add geofeed attribute to PI /48
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]