This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/db-wg@ripe.net/
[db-wg] Role of RIPE NCC in geofeed, abuse-c checks, etc
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ROA and for x.509 certificate (RDAP record)
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Role of RIPE NCC in geofeed, abuse-c checks, etc
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arcadius Ahouansou
arcadius at menelic.com
Tue Apr 12 19:09:50 CEST 2022
Hello Jori, Edward and All. I apologise for resurrecting this very old thread. We are using the files in the ripe DB for creating our own geo-location DB. It's straightforward to get country level geo-ip classification. We are now looking into a city level geo-ip information and I have just come across this old thread about "geofeed" It would be great to know whether this geofeed is already being implemented in the ripe FTP. Thank you very much. With kind regards. Arcadius, On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 15:18, Jori Vanneste via db-wg <db-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Hi Ed, > > On 4/8/2021 3:36 PM, Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote: > > Hi Jori, > > > >> On 8 Apr 2021, at 14:42, Tyrasuki <tyrasuki at pm.me> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Ed, > >> > >> This seems like a good implementation to me. > >> > >> However, I don't think it's a good idea to limit the values on the > "remarks" attribute in this way, as this could cause unwanted side effects > with for ex. messages left on objects for other network operators. > > Given the draft states: > > > > " Any particular inetnum: object MAY have, at most, one geofeed > > reference, whether a remarks: or a proper geofeed: attribute when one > > is defined." > > > > Do we enforce this by validating that there is only one "remarks: > Geofeed" value (or "geofeed:") in the object? > My apologies, I think I missed this section in the draft, thanks for > clarifying the reason to me. > >> Also: > >>> "Do not support non-ASCII values in URL domain names or path (these > must be converted beforehand)" > >> Do you by this mean not supporting non-ASCII entirely? Or to have for > ex. the web-interface convert IDNs to punycode, and have this listed on the > object? > >> > > The RIPE database uses the Latin-1 character set, so IDN domain names or > non-ASCII values in the URL path will be substituted with a '?' character, > by default. > > > > We could support non-ASCII values by automatically converting them (like > we do with non-ASCII domains in email addresses). > > That sounds like a good approach to me, thanks for clarifying. :) > > I think this is indeed a good starting ground for a minimal NWI, and > would like to see where this goes. > > >> If the latter, and remarks can remain free-form, I'd say let's > implement. > >> > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Jori Vanneste > >> FOD11-RIPE > >> > > Regards > > Ed > > > Best regards, > Jori Vanneste > FOD11-RIPE -- Arcadius Ahouansou Menelic Ltd | Applied Knowledge Is Power Office : +441444702101 Mobile: +447908761999 Menelic Ltd: menelic.com SmartLobby: SmartLobby.co <https://smartlobby.co/> Hosted Apache Solr Services: solrfarm.com --- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20220412/0b248b8f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] ROA and for x.509 certificate (RDAP record)
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Role of RIPE NCC in geofeed, abuse-c checks, etc
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]